Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:41

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Nintendo Switch 2 and Mario Kart World available today - My Nintendo News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Doritos, Cheetos, M&Ms and other popular snacks will soon have warning labels in Texas - KHOU
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
PoGO This Week (June 2-8): G-Max Rillaboom, Groudon Raids & GO Fest JC - Pokémon GO Hub
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How does ChatGPT compare to Claude AI?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
New study uncovers surprising physics of 'marine snow' - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Are people who cite the 2nd Amendment honestly familiar with what it establishes?
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.